By prohibiting app developers from using other in-app payment mechanisms, such as a 30% commission, in place of its own, Apple violated state competition rules, according to a Californian court’s ruling. The action may pave the way for NFT and cryptocurrency initiatives to add more functionality to their iOS applications.
A change in Apple’s App Store payment policies and the possibility for Web3 apps to make their iOS apps more functional might also result from the court decision. Cryptocurrencies, the metaverse, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are examples of novel technology components seen in Web3 apps.
Apple’s anti-steering policy prohibits iOS developers from distributing information about outside-of-app purchase options through certain channels, such in-app links. According to the court, the policy increased the prices of the applications made by Epic’s subsidiaries that are still available on Apple’s App Store and discouraged other app users from purchasing Epic Games.
Tim Sweeney, the creator and CEO of Epic Games, verified the news. Apple’s restrictions were found to have “a substantial anticompetitive effect that harms consumers,” based on the court’s opinion, Sweeney wrote. While the court sided with Apple on the majority of points, the tech giant was unsuccessful in its claim that Epic Games shouldn’t be subject to the anti-steering clauses because Apple cancelled Epic Games’ iOS developer account in August 2020.
The court determined that by using both the “balancing test” from the consumer lawsuit and the “tethering test” from the competitor lawsuit, Epic Games would have gained more money. The anti-steering clause is unjust according to both standards, the court decided.
Customers would undoubtedly switch to a platform with cheaper prices if they are aware of the reduced app prices that come from developers’ lower expenses and have the ability to do so, which will increase the revenue of the Epic Games Store.
Concerns have been expressed regarding the decision’s possible effects on the growing metaverse, where virtual worlds and cryptocurrencies intersect, as well as Apple’s dominant status in the app industry. Although the metaverse has been praised as the internet’s future, its future efficacy depends on a decentralised and open environment that is not under the control of any one firm or authority.
Two months ago, the European Union established new anti-monopolistic standards, and as a result, Apple was forced to let third-party app stores on its devices. This allowed users to bypass Apple’s 30% fees. In December, Apple halted NFT transactions that were conducted using Coinbase’s self-custody wallet and demanded payment for a 30% tax through in-app purchases.
Apple responded to this ruling by stating,“We respectfully disagree with the court’s ruling on the one remaining claim under state law and are considering further review.” If Apple’s challenge to this ruling is revoked, it can change the dynamics of the market as well as pave a path for a future not controlled by a monopoly.